If you’re looking for the most fantastic “James Bond” gadgets, please understand that it’s not what you think. A lot of people think that the most famous “James Bond” gadget involves a pen or some sort of portable tool or gadget that he had.
Well, those were important, but if you were to ask people who actually pay attention to how the plot lines of the typical “James Bond” movie pushes forward, they would point you to some sort of vehicle. Whether it’s a jet ski or a helicopter or a car, it’s the vehicle that actually pushes the story forward.
At the risk of sounding corny, it’s actually James Bond’s vehicle that act as the real carriers or vehicles, interestingly enough, of the plot line.
The problem with looking at “James Bond” gadgets as points of interest in and of themselves is that they tend to distract from the plot line. That’s really the bottom line.
As the famous director Quentin Tarantino said, “The reason why I put a lot of violence in my movies is because they push the plot forward. If the killings and blood did not create its intended effect, I would not have put them there.”
He has a point there. And when we just look at the “James Bond” movies with the idea that we’re looking for the most fantastic “James Bond” gadgets, we kind of miss the forest from the trees. We tend to overlook the fact that it’s not the gadget that makes James Bond awesome.
It’s not the fact that James Bond can basically whip out a potato and start talking, and all of a sudden, all this stuff will happen. That’s not what makes James Bond James Bond. Instead, it’s the plot. It’s about how he can get out of a sticky situation time and time again.
And usually, the main gadget, if you will, that gets him from Point A to Point B as far as these sticky situations go, don’t involve some sort of portable or small handheld device. Far from it. In fact, it’s a vehicle.
In the most recent “James Bond” movies, it’s his use of a specially equipped car that enabled him to get out of one sticky situation after another. You really can’t say the same about some gadget.
Gadget Obsession is What Separates “Get Smart” from “James Bond”
Have you ever heard of the American TV series “Get Smart”? It tracks the fortunes and misfortunes of the American spy Maxwell Smart. It really is just a parody of all the “James Bond” movies.
And guess what the centerpiece of the typical “Get Smart” episode is about? That’s right, it’s about gadgets, so people can see how cartoonish an overemphasis on gadgets could be. And that’s why that show got a lot of laughs.
“James Bond” is supposed to be something more serious. It’s supposed to be a nail-biting, exciting exposition of the adventurous life of a cold war era secret agent. And as a result, the focus should be on the plot.
It doesn’t really matter what kind of gadget he’s talking on or what kind of gadget he’s using to trigger something. What matters is what the plot line. is.
And this is how you can tell whether people are being serious or not. In fact, Roger Moore has always been criticized for kind of cheapening the legacy of Sean Connery.
There are many people who are convinced to this very day that Sean Connery was the best James Bond ever. The main reason for that is because they argue that he relied less on gadgets and gimmickry and other tricks and focused more on acting out the plot line. and the scene.
There’s a lot to that criticism. Because when the whole plot line. essentially lives or dies based on a string of gadgets neatly arranged throughout the story, then you really don’t have much of a story. You’re basically using gadgets to cover up for the fact that you have a very thin story.
It’s like trying to use a newspaper to cover up a woman in a bikini. It doesn’t work, and people can see right through it.
And it also didn’t help that Roger Moore tended to act out the James Bond role in a cartoonish and a shallow kind of way. In a way, it’s kind of a self-referencing joke. It’s as if he was winking at the crowd and saying, “Well, this is just a joke anyway and you’re in on the joke.”
Well, that kind of rubs a lot of “James Bond” purists and hardcore fans the wrong way. I can see where they’re coming from, and a lot of that criticism boils down to the gadgets being used.
So, if you’re really looking for the most fantastic “James Bond” gadgets, don’t look at the small stuff. That’s right, don’t sweat the small stuff. Focus on the vehicles because that’s where the real action truly is.
Another key thing to keep in mind about cars is that they require more logistical superiority. Let’s put it this way, coming up with a clever gadget may be traced to one clever scientist like Q. But if Bond uses a car, someone has to do all sorts of things to it. In other words, there has to be a cadre of highly skilled people making sure that car remains in tip top shape and would enable Bond to do what he needs to do.
What’s involved? Well, at the very least there has to be a maintenance bay. These are not cheap. Given the kind of technology that goes into the typical Bond car, you can bet there’s a whole lot of techno wizardry happening in the background. Also, you have to account for the array of replacement parts to keep such cars functional. Again, this needs a whole lot of skilled and clever people.
No matter how you cut it, if you are a deep thinker who thinks in terms of systems, Bond’s cars definitely take the cake when it comes to awesomeness. None of his other gadgets can even come close.